Kalaeb wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2019 1:48 am
That you are here asking questions means at some point you will likely own a large amount of both. That being said, when I was in professional kitchens I always tended towards larger knives. Now that i am just a home cook, I use smaller knives. My ultimate size is about 225mm. Either an undersized 240, or an oversized 210 are great for me.
A long time ago Salty posted this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zq37b1wG-yo
something to think about.
Kalaeb you don't know me, but clearly know me all too well! LOL!! I will most certainly end up owning many gyutos of different sizes given enough time and money! Hehe!
Thanks for the video link! I actually came across that video a couple weeks ago when I was trying to look for videos on YouTube to help me decide what size chef knife I should go for. The guy certainly made a good point. However, my only concern would be in a given situation where I'm trying to cut on a smaller board that may not be large enough to accommodate a 240. By "given situations" I'm referring to when I may bring my knives to family's homes to cook for the holiday gatherings or if I have a dinner party at my foodie friend's homes where I'm going to help in prepping dinner with them. More often than not, it seems all too common that people don't seem to ever buy properly sized cutting boards- unless they're "knife people", which is usually not the case! Lol.
So that's really the only reason I could see for opting for a 210, as it's the closest in size to the universal 8" chef knife. Granted, if you're trying to process large quantities of food or doubling up on potatos like that guy Salty did in this video, then sure, a 240 is going to make life easier. But as home cooks (even having a large dinner party for 12) there's really no rush on cutting like there would be in a professional kitchen, so you can cut one thing at a time. So the need for something larger than an 8" chef knife is usually not there.
So at the end of the day I look at them like this:
210-
Pros:
-cheaper to purchase
-more versatile in cramped kitchens or when used on small cutting boards
-most chef knives in general are always offered in an 8" option whereas larger sizes are not always offered or are not offered in a standard size (i.e. You may only have an option for 9", 9.5", or 10") and you don't always know what models will offer what sizes once you step up from an 8". Note: I'm referring to mass produced chef knives here, not necessarily the knives offered here at CKTG.
-Since 8" is considered the universal standard for a chef knife, an 8" will likely be the most common size chef knife you will find in anyone's home, so it's always nice to be comfortable using the most commonly encountered size.
Cons: may be difficult to process larger amounts of product at one time (i.e. Ability to fit more product under the blade at a given time).
-may pose difficulty when processing extremely large items such as watermelon, large cabbage, jackfruit, etc.
240-
Pros:
- able to process larger ingredients (see above)
- able to process larger amounts of product at once (i.e. Able to fit more products under the blade)
- makes a better slicer for protein due to extra cutting edge length.
Cons:
-size may be inconvenient in cramped kitchens or when working with small cutting boards, especially when rock chopping where the tip of the blade may slip off the front end of a small cutting board
- slightly more inconvenient in terms of storage with regards to fitting in universal knife blocks or knife docks for drawers
-more expensive to purchase when compared to 210.
Anyways, that's what I could come up with off the top of my head. Please feel free to add to it!