Vitamix 5200

Post great deals you've discovered on kitchenware like pots & pans, countertop appliances, knife blocks, towels and gadgets, etc.
Forum rules
Post great deals you've discovered on kitchenware like pots & pans, countertop appliances, knife blocks, towels and gadgets, etc.

Please do not announce deals from competitors on knives and sharpening stones. We reserve the right to delete posts that violate these rules.
Post Reply
Nmiller21k
Posts: 2822
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 11:55 pm
Location: Minnesota
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Vitamix 5200

Post by Nmiller21k »

On sale, amazon.



$101.00 off... really great blender love mine.
mdl130
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:31 pm
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Vitamix 5200

Post by mdl130 »

That's an amazing deal! I got a reconditioned Vitamix for the same price and it ended up being the 6300 (paid an addition $50 for the extended warranty - 10 years total). It's a game changer for soups, sauces, etc. FWIW Cook's Illustrated consistently ranks the 5200 as the best blender.

For the crowd who says "Why do I need to spend so much on a blender?" Just try it and you'll understand.
Cutuu
Posts: 3533
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:00 pm
Has thanked: 285 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Re: Vitamix 5200

Post by Cutuu »

I love mine. Its going on about 8 years. Couldnt imagine not having it.
keithmarder
Posts: 419
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:52 pm

Re: Vitamix 5200

Post by keithmarder »

Beat me to it
keithmarder
Posts: 419
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:52 pm

Re: Vitamix 5200

Post by keithmarder »

Would a reconditioned 5300 for $30 more be a better purchase?
User avatar
Jeff B
Posts: 14757
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:59 pm
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Has thanked: 1987 times
Been thanked: 2352 times

Re: Vitamix 5200

Post by Jeff B »

keithmarder wrote: Tue Mar 06, 2018 5:44 pm Would a reconditioned 5300 for $30 more be a better purchase?
If you want the pulse function and low profile container, personal preferences. The motors are basically the same.
If God wanted me to be a vegetarian he wouldn't have made animals taste so good.
keithmarder
Posts: 419
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:52 pm

Re: Vitamix 5200

Post by keithmarder »

Jeff B wrote: Tue Mar 06, 2018 10:47 pm
keithmarder wrote: Tue Mar 06, 2018 5:44 pm Would a reconditioned 5300 for $30 more be a better purchase?
If you want the pulse function and low profile container, personal preferences. The motors are basically the same.
Thanks, Jeff. Seems like the low profile would be much more function to fit under cabinets
mdl130
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:31 pm
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Vitamix 5200

Post by mdl130 »

You should look at what cooks illustrated said about the low profile container. They prefer the skinny tall container.
User avatar
Jeff B
Posts: 14757
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:59 pm
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Has thanked: 1987 times
Been thanked: 2352 times

Re: Vitamix 5200

Post by Jeff B »

mdl130 wrote: Wed Mar 07, 2018 8:43 am You should look at what cooks illustrated said about the low profile container. They prefer the skinny tall container.
Haven't seen the cooks illustrated article(can't seem to find it) but from everything I've read the low profile container works just as well and for some things better. But where it struggles is with smaller batches.
If God wanted me to be a vegetarian he wouldn't have made animals taste so good.
gladius
Posts: 5306
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:59 pm
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 941 times

Re: Vitamix 5200

Post by gladius »

Jeff B wrote: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:48 pm Haven't seen the cooks illustrated article(can't seem to find it) but from everything I've read the low profile container works just as well and for some things better. But where it struggles is with smaller batches.
-----
https://www.cooksillustrated.com/equipm ... d-blenders
User avatar
Jeff B
Posts: 14757
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:59 pm
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Has thanked: 1987 times
Been thanked: 2352 times

Re: Vitamix 5200

Post by Jeff B »

gladius wrote: Wed Mar 07, 2018 10:12 pm
Jeff B wrote: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:48 pm Haven't seen the cooks illustrated article(can't seem to find it) but from everything I've read the low profile container works just as well and for some things better. But where it struggles is with smaller batches.
-----
https://www.cooksillustrated.com/equipm ... d-blenders
I've seen that page with their reviews of the blenders but they don't specifically address the pros/cons of the different Vitamix containers on that page. Not sure what article that mdl130 alluded to.
If God wanted me to be a vegetarian he wouldn't have made animals taste so good.
LaVieestBelle
Posts: 1224
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:20 pm
Location: Ohio
Has thanked: 542 times
Been thanked: 503 times

Re: Vitamix 5200

Post by LaVieestBelle »

There are some differences between the two models.

The 5200 has a slightly less powerful motor. I believe it is 2 hp, compared to the 2.2 hp of the 5300. The 5300 generation is also designed to run slightly quieter.

While I like the 5300 version, it does suffer just slightly when working with the tiniest quantities. Really just talking about teeny amounts of salsa and the like.

Vitamix does offer a number of smaller containers that work with the 5300 and they largely solve this problem, if this is the machine you like. The standard container is 64 ounces. They are not cheap, but Vitamix sells 48 and 32 wet blade containers as accessories.

I have a Vitamix from the 5300 series (the Vitamix 300) and have both accessory containers. They are great extras when you either need a spare or want something with a smaller design. I would be perfectly happy with either the 5200 or the 5300 but tend to have a slight preference for the greater power and quieter function of the 5300 as long as I can jump to a smaller container when I want to.

Had my first Vitamix for 18 years and love them. Caveat....I actually have sold them!
Post Reply